Compare AI models: Kimi K2.6 vs Hy4 preview
- Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Hy4 previewTencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 78/100 | 32/100 | 63/100 | 50/100 | 27/100 |
| Hy4 preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 40/100 | 87/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.95/ 1M
$0.83/ 1M
Output
$4.00/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.16/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
57K
47K
Completed sessions
208,393
118,953
Token share
0.01%
0.01%
Tokens
89B-84%
189B-2%
SEP 9NOV 3
SEP 9NOV 3
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
54.4%2K user-weeks
48.5%1.1K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K2.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy4 preview vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 preview·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K2.6 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy4 preview vs Jamba MiniHy4 preview·Jamba Mini