Compare AI models: Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.7
- Kimi K3MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 10/100 | 92/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$3.00/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$15/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
217K
67K
Completed sessions
697,736
167,120
Token share
0.04%
0.01%
Tokens
495B-73%
84B+100%
SEP 9NOV 3
SEP 9NOV 3
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
41%15K user-weeks
44.4%1.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K3 vs Jamba MiniKimi K3·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini