Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs flint-40b

MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
flint-40bRecursiveHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	68/100	81/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
flint-40b	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder

Overview

Author

MiniMax

Recursive

Context length

Unknown

Reasoning

True

Unknown

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Unknown

Output modalities

Text

Unknown

Providers

MiniMax

Recursive

Pricing

Input

$0.15/ 1M

Unknown

Output

$0.60/ 1M

Unknown

Cached input

$0.01/ 1M

Unknown

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

951K

58K

Completed sessions

125,662,743

605,395

Token share

14.8%

0.07%

Tokens

188T+100%

838B+100%

SEP 9NOV 3

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

72.3%14K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-FlashDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeflint-40b vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructflint-40bDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-FlashJamba Mini Related comparisonflint-40b vs Jamba Miniflint-40bJamba Mini