Compare AI models: MiniMax-M2.7 vs Grok 4.6

MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
MiniMax-M2.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	76/100	56/100	50/100	0/100	0/100
Grok 4.6	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	39/100	25/100	75/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

MiniMax

xAI

Context length

205K

500K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image

Output modalities

Text

Providers

MiniMax

xAI

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$2.00/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$6.00/ 1M

Cached input

$0.06/ 1M

$0.50/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

34K

45K

Completed sessions

129,252

107,065

Token share

0.01%

Tokens

106B-67%

45B+27%

SEP 9NOV 3

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

57%1.4K user-weeks

34.9%2.2K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.7Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7Jamba Mini Related comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6Jamba Mini