Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 76/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 59/100 | 91/100 | 21/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.14/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Output
$0.28/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.3M
31K
Completed sessions
19,594,092
76,332
Token share
4.79%
0%
Tokens
61T-79%
17B-92%
SEP 9NOV 3
SEP 9NOV 3
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.3%88K user-weeks
42.7%709 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeQwen3.7 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Max·Jamba Mini