GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiMo-V2.5

  1. Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.7 Plus50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.517/10053/10076/10092/10067/10050/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.40/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
Output
$1.60/ 1M
$0.28/ 1M
Cached input
$0.08/ 1M
$0.0028/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
114K
646K
Completed sessions
1,240,408
28,227,198
Token share
0.05%
1.45%
Tokens
657B-60%
18T-60%
SEP 9NOV 3
SEP 9NOV 3
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.7%6.1K user-weeks
63.8%14K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.