Compare AI models: Qwen3.7 Max vs Grok 4.6
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Max | 59/100 | 91/100 | 21/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 39/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.50/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$7.50/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
31K
45K
Completed sessions
76,332
107,065
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
17B-92%
45B+27%
SEP 9NOV 3
SEP 9NOV 3
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
42.7%709 user-weeks
34.9%2.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.7 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6·Jamba Mini